Maintaining CRS Compliance: Strategies for Financial Institutions | EY
Navigating Compliance Challenges in CRS Reporting: Insights and Best Practices
Tax authorities around the world are cracking down on financial institutions that fail to comply with the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), leading to increased scrutiny and potential penalties for non-compliance. In countries like Canada, Australia, Ireland, and Singapore, tax authorities are investing in enhanced data analysis capabilities and hiring additional inspectors to ensure compliance with CRS requirements.
In Canada, tax authorities are conducting onsite and desk audits of institutions to assess compliance with Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and CRS requirements. Similarly, in Australia, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is shifting its focus from guidance to enforcement and investing heavily in data analytics capability to ensure compliance.
However, compliance with CRS presents many challenges for financial institutions, including operational and technical complexities. Mistakes often occur when multiple teams are responsible for compliance or when key team members leave the organization, leading to incorrect reporting and potential penalties.
To stay compliant with CRS requirements, financial institutions are advised to ensure all entities are correctly classified and registered, review governance and implement controls annually, stay abreast of filing deadlines and reporting requirements, analyze and clean up data regularly, and engage with tax authorities early to address any issues.
Overall, the increased scrutiny on CRS compliance highlights the importance of vigilance and proactive measures to avoid penalties and ensure regulatory compliance in the ever-evolving financial landscape.